Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby arborlad » Tue Oct 29, 2013 6:38 pm

MacadamB53 wrote: If I could remove my useless posts I would do that also.



You can still edit if you wish, or 'report' the post you wish removed. Given the number of times your posts have been 'quoted', and vice versa, it would be time consuming for Admin. to achieve an equitable result.
arborlad

smile...it confuses people
arborlad
 
Posts: 7384
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Ads are not endorsed by www.gardenlaw.co.uk or the staff thereof and visitors should perform their own due diligence on the product or service offered.
 

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby MacadamB53 » Wed Oct 30, 2013 5:54 pm

Already, considerable editing of posts in this thread has occured after responses have been made by other posters. That strikes me as dishonest at best and wholly unnecessary.


Nice use of some subjective and emotive language.

For one who writes they are keen to stay on topic this surprises me.

Admin have asked that we use the <!> button to report any posts we think have broken the forum rules.

So I'm with pinkie in so far as all posts in this thread should remain.

Humble regards, Mac

PS pinkie, Admin do not agree that editing is "dishonest at best"
MacadamB53
 
Posts: 6024
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:13 am

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby MacadamB53 » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:59 pm

For posterity, this needs to be considered:
arborlad wrote:
MacadamB53 wrote: Otherwise local planning offices would have to be consulted each and every time someone was thinking of grubbing up a hedgerow and replacing it with an eg. wooden fence. Farcical idea - surely they'd sooner add an extra bullet to the guide.

Kind regards, Mac


They did: You do not need planning permission for hedges taken from the Planning Portal as linked to by Pinkie, who is correct.


The actual wording is "You do not need planning permission for hedges as such"
MacadamB53
 
Posts: 6024
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:13 am

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby TO » Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:22 pm

Hi
You may need consent to remove a hedgerow. A blanket statement that you can remove hedges is likely to lead to misery for someone. I wouldn't rely on the Planning Portal as the font of all knowledge.

TO
TO
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:05 pm

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby MacadamB53 » Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:04 pm

TO wrote:Hi
You may need consent to remove a hedgerow. A blanket statement that you can remove hedges is likely to lead to misery for someone. I wouldn't rely on the Planning Portal as the font of all knowledge.

TO


agreed
MacadamB53
 
Posts: 6024
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:13 am

Re: Removing Laurel and replacing with fencing...

Postby MacadamB53 » Fri Nov 08, 2013 8:44 pm

Hi TO,

and they don't need to receive a complaint before they can issue one.


For the record, my local planning office made it very clear during our conversation they would not take action unless prompted by a complaint - I made a point of asking the question outright and got a definitive answer.

But, as I tried to make clear in the post, this was only my LPO's view.

Kind regards, Mac
MacadamB53
 
Posts: 6024
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 12:13 am

Previous

Return to Hedges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest