Drainage: The water has to go somewhere!

[arborlad]

Arborlad, I am still waiting for an answer to the question I asked you 5 years ago. But you clammed up didn't you. I wonder why that was.

I believe the question to be a fiction, non-existent, a product of your imagination..................

[Morgan Sweet]

Arborlad, I am still waiting for an answer to the question I asked you 5 years ago. But you clammed up didn't you. I wonder why that was.

May I suggest Rosenberg, when dealing with any legal matters it is most important that you follow the accepted protocols. It is not (normally) the correct protocol to ask a question of a Judge and expect an answer, the predominant role of a Judge is to make rulings.

[arborlad]

The reason that I wrote I would prefer not to have you as a neighbour is due to nothing more than I hate having to listen to other people's music.

Music aside - how would you feel about a neighbour who drives over your land and gets all uppity when you prevent it, and sheds surface water onto it?

If Rosenberg's neighbour had joined the Forum at the time and asked for advice on the trespass - without exception the advice would be to erect something to prevent it!!!

[Morgan Sweet]

The reason that I wrote I would prefer not to have you as a neighbour is due to nothing more than I hate having to listen to other people's music.

Music aside - how would you feel about a neighbour who drives over your land and gets all uppity when you prevent it, and sheds surface water onto it?

To answer your question, I would not be too happy about it. In saying that, I do have neighbours who repeatedly ride horses over my drive way and use my drive as a vehicle turning area and passing bay but I am quite content for them to be my neighbours. It is surely dependant on the degree of aggravation. I did once close off my drive but it caused such a nuisance for everyone wanting to pass on a narrow single track road that I removed it (to be neighbourly). I can not abide unwanted music however, M'Lud.

[arborlad]

The reason that I wrote I would prefer not to have you as a neighbour is due to nothing more than I hate having to listen to other people's music.

Music aside - how would you feel about a neighbour who drives over your land and gets all uppity when you prevent it, and sheds surface water onto it?

To answer your question, I would not be too happy about it. In saying that, I do have neighbours who repeatedly ride horses over my drive way and use my drive as a vehicle turning area and passing bay but I am quite content for them to be my neighbours. It is surely dependant on the degree of aggravation. I did once close off my drive but it caused such a nuisance for everyone wanting to pass on a narrow single track road that I removed it (to be neighbourly). I can not abide unwanted music however.

...............and the surface water?

[Morgan Sweet]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

[arborlad]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

No - it wouldn't, there is no amount of surface water you can shed onto your neighbours land.

[arborlad]

I've heard of "intelligence-led policing", if that's what you mean.

That's an interesting choice of words, the OP in that thread did the right thing by reporting it to the police and giving the details, if there's another incident involving a van with two occupants but no details, the police can join the dots and the scrotes will be apprehended more swiftly.

The scrotes on the other hand are on an intelligence gathering exercise if they manage to gain access, they will notice the weak lock on the patio door, they will notice the expensive mower in an unlocked shed, they will notice the ladder tucked behind the garage, they will notice the dummy cameras from the real ones................

[Morgan Sweet]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

No - it wouldn't, there is no amount of surface water you can shed onto your neighbours land.

There you go, once again Arborlad, you did not comprehend the answer to the question you poised. You asked me how I would feel about a neighbour shedding water on to my land. I then replied that it would be dependant on the amount of surface water. Your response to my answer lacks understanding of both the question that you asked and my reply.

[MacadamB53]

Hi arborlad,

you: how would you [Morgan Sweet] feel about a neighbour who... ...sheds surface water onto it [your land]?

MS: it would be dependant on the amount of surface water

you: No - it wouldn’t, there is no amount of surface water you can shed onto your neighbours land.

I understand the point you’re trying to make, but the above makes no sense because your question never mentioned MS shedding water onto his neighbour’s land?!?

kind regards, Mac

[arborlad]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

You are wrong.

[Collaborate]

This is a message to Admin.

Is there any chance this thread can be locked? It's deviated so far from its original purpose it now seems to be the equivalent of two drunks squaring up to each other outside a pub, neither wanting to "leave it" and neither letting it die a natural death.

[raymilland]

This is a message to Admin.

Is there any chance this thread can be locked? It's deviated so far from its original purpose it now seems to be the equivalent of two drunks squaring up to each other outside a pub, neither wanting to "leave it" and neither letting it die a natural death.

+1 from me

[Morgan Sweet]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

You are wrong.

You continue to reply with quotes that are taken completely out of context. Please let me try and help you. You asked me how I would feel about surface water on by property. I replied, as above, that it would be dependant on the amount of surface water. You replied that I was wrong. How you presume to know how I would feel about surface water on my property baffles me. I think, as with many of your ill-informed rulings, that you are once again rather deluded. I will leave it there.

[arborlad]

M'Lud, it would be dependant on the amount of surface water.

I misread, you are correct.