arborlad wrote: ↑
Fri May 24, 2019 9:18 pm
Rosenberg wrote: ↑
Fri May 24, 2019 7:58 pm
After being called:
- a 'deluded bell end' (by Collaborate)
- a 'pervert' (by Collaborate, because I am a naturist)
- an exhibitionist, or words to that effect (by Clifford Pope, again because I am a naturist)
- a 'liar' (by arborlad, because I maintain that I have not colluded with one of his 'arch-enemies' on this forum [a bit paranoid there arborlad])
and a number of other insulting names which have since been deleted by Admin, arborlad has now resorted to making a string of unfounded accusations. For the record there is no evidence of any unneighbourly behaviour for Hyacinth's pervi-copter to gather. I am not:
- trespassing on his land or property;
- shedding surface water onto land I don't own (other than natural run-off);
- making noise that a reasonable person would regard as a statutory nuisance.
I have already stated clearly in this thread that my neighbour used his pervi-copter for spying on my wife while she was sun-bathing in our enclosed
garden. We have undeniable evidence of that (e.g. video close-ups of my wife's genitalia taken by our neighbour's pervi-copter). He has also spied on me and other members of my family while we've been in our garden, a garden which is fully enclosed and in which we have a reasonable expectation of privacy. It is only because that video evidence is currently in our possession that my neighbour has now stopped overflying our garden.
It is all detailed clearly earlier in this thread. Yet arborlad chooses to ignore those facts and make a series of spurious accusations instead.
Why is that arborlad? And what are you going to accuse me of next?
Your accusations are spurious arborlad. You went to all that trouble of researching problems I posted about many years ago (how long did that take you?), assumed that they remain unresolved, and, worse, that I was at fault on all three counts. I'll update you so you can see where you went wrong:
Accusations 1 - Encroachment: We now have wall to properly delineate our driveway - so we could not encroach on Hyacynth's land with our vehicles even if we wanted to. If he wanted to monitor the position of the wall (with a pervi-copter or otherwise) the time to do so, and to take legal action if he felt it necessary, would have been when the wall was built (10 years ago).
Accusation 2 - Drainage: The whole idea of illegal drainage is absurd in this case. The drainage that does occur is not materially different from natural drainage. The same amount of water spread over the same total length of boundary. When it comes to 'artificialness', it is a question of degree: you could argue that a single tree, planted by me on the boundary, disturbs the natural flow of water but to say that the result is an illegal discharge would be a load of sloblock.
Accusation 3 - Noise: My son used to make the same sort of noise as any other normal teenager. Though it has never been a statutory nuisance, he has made even less noise as he has got older. He moved out several years ago so this could not be the reason Hyacynth flew his pervi-copter over my naked wife. If it is equipped with a microphone, as you suggest, he'd need to use it in accordance with the ICO's guidance: they tend to disapprove of that kind of thing.